Posted by: David Giacalone | January 18, 2013

more over-trimming by National Grid

  An article in today’s Schenectady Gazette discusses the issues raised by National Grid’s aggressive trimming of trees in the Stockade and Union Triangle neighborhoods the past two weeks. See “Residents upset after trees trimmed,” by Kathleen Moore, B3, January 18, 2013, online by subscription).  This is, of course, not a new issue, and Stockade residents have complained about the ugly over-amputation of tree limbs and topping of trees, and the resulting loss of shade and beauty, for many years.  The “trimming” is done, of course, in an attempt to prevent power outages and other damage from falling limbs.

In the Gazette piece, National Grid forester Michael Freed is quoted saying he could not cut back trees any less, and that they often trim less than the company’s guidelines, which are to cut back 10 feet away from the primary wire and 18 inches from secondary wires.  They often leave behind lopsided trees, and National Grid spokesman Patrick Stella suggests that homeowners could request that their trees be “rounded out” after safety cuts are made.  Gillespie St. resident Jackie Craven complained about the over-cutting of flowering pear trees on her street.  ReTree Schenectady, which planted those trees, now attempts to put shorter trees under power lines.

Earlier this week, I wrote to the Stockade neighborhood Yahoo email list, complaining about the over-trimming that occurred again last week, when a Lewis Tree Service crew came through the Stockade on behalf of National Grid.  As an example, I gave the treatment of a healthy tree in front of 101 Front St., behind the statue of Lawrence the Indian; see the image at the head of this posting.  The following collage was attached to my email message, comparing that tree on the day when Lawrence was removed for cleaning last May with its current sad state (L):

tree in front of 101 Front St.  - Schenectady NY Stockade - comparison after being trimmed by National Grid

- 101 Front St. –  comparison before and after trimming -

- click on an image for a larger version -

The damage from the amputations will be even more apparent when the leaves return this Spring.  Imagine, for example, the view behind Lawrence with all the leaves above his biceps gone.

I understand that trimming is required for safety reasons, but our trees are too valuable to be treated with so little care.  The City of Schenectady needs to let National Grid know that the company must be far more discerning when trimming our trees.  Unfortunately, the City does not seem to appreciate the importance of trees to our cityscape and ecology.  You may recall, for instance, that this weblog — which was originally named “Preserve Our Stockade Trees” — was created in April 2010 to fight the City’s plan to cut down all the mature trees on Washington Avenue when it repaved the road and replaced sidewalks.  See our first posting.  When we protested that foolish plan, the City purportedly decided to punish the Stockade by not repaving. [follow-up (May 19, 2014): more than four years later, there has been no repaving.]

- 101 Front St.: autumn colors during the 2010 Stockade-athon -

One possible solution to this problem is contained in a bill proposed again this year in the New York Assembly by District 92 Assemblyman, Thomas J. Abinanti. Assembly Bill A02300 would add an Article 3 to the NYS Public Service Code in order to regulate the cutting, topping and removal of trees upon rights of way by providers of electric service, setting up a commission that would make and enforce regulations meant to assure that tree maintenance is done in a manner that has a less destructive impact on our trees.

In addition to requiring that a State arborist certify the need for trimming or removal of a tree, and requiring notice to a municipality and homeowners, the Bill states that:

  • “An electric corporation or municipality may prune a tree within a right of way only when an arborist,  designated  by  the  department  of agriculture  and  markets,  certifies  that  the  part of the tree to be pruned is dead, diseased, a broken branch, resting against a service  or distribution  line,  or  poses or could reasonably be expected to pose a danger to a service or distribution line.
  • “No electric  corporation  or  municipality  shall  engage  in  the topping  of  a  tree in a right of way so as to remove more than twenty-five percent of the foliage within an annual growing season.”
  • An electric corporation or municipality may  remove  a tree  from  a  right  of  way  only  when [a designated arborist] . . . certifies that  the  tree  to  be removed  is  dead,  diseased, broken, that its branches are so entangled with a service or distribution line that pruning  cannot  be  reasonably expected  to  prevent interference with such line, its trunk is touching such a line, or otherwise poses a danger to a  service  or  distribution line if not removed.”

Mr. Abinanti needs co-sponsors and public support to move his Bill through the Assembly.  Please let your Assemblyman know that you support the goals and requirements of Bill A02300.  You can reach 110th Assembly District representative Phil Steck, by clicking here.

- use the short URL http://tinyurl.com/OverTrim to share this posting.

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: